The Bruges Group spearheaded the intellectual battle to win a vote to leave the European Union and, above all, against the emergence of a centralised EU state.

NOTE! This site uses cookies and similar technologies.

If you not change browser settings, you agree to it. Learn more

I understand

Cookies are a technology which we use to provide you with tailored information on our website. A cookie is a piece of code that is sent to your internet browser and is stored on your system.

Please see below for a list of cookies this website uses:

Cookie name: _utma, _utmb, _utmc, _utmz

Purpose: Google Analytics cookies. Google Analytics is software that lets us analyse how visitors use our site. We use this information to improve our website and provide the best experience to visitors.

Function: These cookies collect data in an anonymous form. Please see Google's privacy policy for further information. To opt out of these cookies, please visit Google's website.

Cookie name: Sitecore

Purpose: Stores information, such as language and regional preferences, that our content management system (the system we use to update our website) relies on to function.

Function: This is a session cookie and will be destroyed when you close your browser. This cookie is essential for our website to function.

Cookie name: ASP.net_session

Purpose: Allows the website to save your session state across different pages. For example, if you have completed a survey, the website will remember that you have done so and will not ask you to complete it again when you view another page on the website.

Function: This is a session cookie and will be destroyed when you close your browser. This cookie is essential for our website to function.

Cookie name: website#sc_wede

Purpose: Indicates whether the user's browser supports inline editing of content. This indicates whether our content management system will work for our website administrators in their internet browsers.

Function: This is a session cookie and will be destroyed when you close your browser. This cookie is essential for our website to function.

Cookie name: redirected

Purpose: Remembers when the site forwards you from one page to another, so you can return to the first page. For example, go back to the home page after viewing a special 'splash' page.

Function: This is a session cookie, which your browser will destroy when it shuts down. The website needs this cookie to function.

Cookie name: tccookiesprefs

Purpose: Remembers when you respond to the site cookie policy, so you do not see the cookie preferences notice on every page.

Function: If you choose to remember your preference with a temporary cookie, your browser will remove it when you shut it down, otherwise the cookie will be stored for about a year.

Cookie name: _ga

Purpose: Additional Google Analytics cookie. Google Analytics is software that lets us analyse how visitors use our site. We use this information to improve our website and provide the best experience to visitors.

Function: These cookies collect data in an anonymous form. Please see Google's privacy policy for further information.

Cookie name: SC_ANALYTICS_GLOBAL_COOKIE, SC_ANALYTICS_SESSION_COOKIE

Purpose: Sitecore Analytics is software that lets us analyse how visitors use our site. We use this information to improve our website and provide the best experience to visitors.

Function: These cookies collect data in an anonymous form. When you close your browser, it will delete the 'session' cookie; it will keep the 'global' cookie for about one year.

Facebook cookies

We use Facebook 'Like' buttons to share site feedback. For further information, see Facebook's cookie policy page.

Twitter cookies

We use Twitter 'Tweet' buttons to share site feedback. For further information, see Twitter's privacy statement.

YouTube cookies

We embed videos from our official YouTube channel. YouTube uses cookies to help maintain the integrity of video statistics, prevent fraud and to improve their site experience. If you view a video, YouTube may set cookies on your computer once you click on the video player.

Cookies pop-up

When you close the cookies pop-up box by clicking "OK", a permanent cookie will be set on your machine. This will remember your preference so that the pop-up doesn't display across any pages whenever you visit the website.

Opting out/removing cookies

To opt out of Google Analytics cookies, please visit Google’s website.

You can also control what cookies you accept through your internet browser. For details on how to do this, please visit aboutcookies.org. Please note that by deleting our cookies or disabling future cookies you may not be able to access certain areas or features of our website.

mailing list
donate now
join now
shop

But does God support the EU Constitution?

Dr Helen Szamuely

ButdoesGodsupporttheEUConstitution

Of all the many disagreements about the text of the EU Constitution, discussed last week and yesterday (Monday, May 24) by the Foreign Ministers and to be presented to the Summit in Dublin on June 17, the most extraordinary concerns God. What started off as a small complaint by one or two countries has turned into a full-throated chorus. No fewer than seven member states - Italy, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Portugal, the Czech Republic and Slovakia – sent a letter to the Irish Presidency demanding that there should be a reference to Christianity in the Constitution. Spain has decided to abandon that particular cause. What these countries want to do is, if one may put it that way, beef up the rather wishy-washy preamble to the Constitution, which refers to the "cultural, religious and humanist inheritance of Europe". Well, you can see their point.

There are clearly problems with the whole issue. In the first place, religion should have no place in a political constitution, whose main aim should be a clear designation and limitation of powers exercised by the body in question, in this case undoubtedly a state, and by its various organs.

Secondly, there is Turkey. Its government is already furious with what it sees as a relentless dragging out of the accession process. The inclusion of Christianity in the Constitution would quite clearly mean that Turkey could never become a member state. That may be quite a good idea from their point of view but, if that is what the EU has in mind that it should say so openly and create some kind of alternative structures for dealing with a near neighbour who is also an important ally.

The whole argument opens up the deep fissures in Europe, calls attention to centuries’ old conflicts and undermines the whole notion of there being one set of European values. Or, rather, reminds us all that those European values are not all about sweetness and light

Most importantly, however, the whole argument opens up the deep fissures in Europe, calls attention to centuries’ old conflicts and undermines the whole notion of there being one set of European values. Or, rather, reminds us all that those European values are not all about sweetness and light, though they are, frequently about swashbuckling curiosity and advancement in political, social, economic and intellectual matters – all of which is alien to the European Union with its prattle about European values.

The great dividing lines in post-Classical European history have been religious. At present, only one of the EU member states is Eastern Orthodox (as well as a former part of the Ottoman Empire), Greece, but certain problems in outlook have already been apparent. There is a secondary dividing line and that is between Catholic and Protestant countries. Fortunately, in most parts of Europe, the various denominations have learned to live in peace (nothing to do with the European Union and everything with historical and economic development) but some attitudes remain different. It is noticeable that all the countries who are looking for an inclusion of Christianity in the constitution are largely Catholic. For various historical reasons, the largely Protestant countries are shying away from the idea.

For several of the signatories their Catholic identity has been an aid in fight against both Nazism and Communism. They see it as a positive and enlightened attitude that needs to be emphasised and celebrated. They are also worried that if the Church and the faith are no longer directly under attack, they might succumb to modern secularism.

Some Catholic countries are not too keen either. Ireland, as the current President, is not anxious to rock the boat even more. We shall see whether her attitude will change with the passing of the Presidency. Spain has decided to opt out for reasons of its own, possibly because it now has a left-wing socialist government or possibly the better to concentrate on other, more specific demands.

Given the history of the Lowlands and its own internal problems, Belgium may not be over-anxious to raise the spectre of a religious discussion. France is adamant that Christianity should not be associated with the Constitution. The reason lies in French history and politics. The great division has been historically (at least since the expulsion of the Huguenots) between the monarchist, Catholic right and the republican, secularist left. The idea and tradition of the secular state is of supreme importance in France. It underlies that rather silly row about headscarves and other visible symbols of faith; it also means that, though nominally a Catholic country, France is unlikely to agree to a mixing of politics and religion.

Germany, the other powerful member state, has a mixture of denominations and is the land where the notion of cuius regio eius religio originated in the seventeenth century. Roughly speaking, the religious wars were brought to an end in 1648 by a decision to allow the ruler of each state or the state itself to choose whether it wanted to be Catholic or Lutheran (unless it happened to be one of the bits France grabbed, in which case it was the French King who decided).

So much for modern history. There are other difficulties and all of them lie in Europe’s past and in those hard to define European values. Do we mean Christianity or Judaeo-Christianity? The two are linked together in theological, historical and cultural ways and the Jews, for better for worse, have been part of European history from the 1st century AD, at least. What of Europe’s Graeco-Roman or pagan heritage? Is that covered by that rather mealy-mouthed expression “humanist inheritance”? Probably not, as one recalls some aspects of classical religion and philosophy. But they are European values as well.

Finally, what of the Muslim population? There are many of them in Europe and they can safely say that, again for better for worse, they, too, have been part of European history. Indeed, some of the things Europe is so proud of, such as the Renaissance, would not have been possible without the survival of ancient learning under Arab and Moorish rule. That was in the past and more recent relations have been considerably more difficult (though all those conquests and counter-conquests were not exactly picnics). But where do they fit in the scheme as suggested by the Constitution and the seven advocates of Christianity as part of it?

On the one hand the phrase is so vague as to be meaningless, on the other hand all definitions become very particular. But that is what makes European history fascinating and what made Europe such a vibrant entity

How difficult it all becomes when you start defining European values. On the one hand the phrase is so vague as to be meaningless, on the other hand all definitions become very particular. But that is what makes European history fascinating and what made Europe such a vibrant entity. Do we really want a Constitution that wants to regulate even European history to death?
Do we really want a Constitution that wants to regulate even European history to death?