The Bruges Group spearheaded the intellectual battle to win a vote to leave the European Union and, above all, against the emergence of a centralised EU state.

NOTE! This site uses cookies and similar technologies.

If you not change browser settings, you agree to it. Learn more

I understand

Cookies are a technology which we use to provide you with tailored information on our website. A cookie is a piece of code that is sent to your internet browser and is stored on your system.

Please see below for a list of cookies this website uses:

Cookie name: _utma, _utmb, _utmc, _utmz

Purpose: Google Analytics cookies. Google Analytics is software that lets us analyse how visitors use our site. We use this information to improve our website and provide the best experience to visitors.

Function: These cookies collect data in an anonymous form. Please see Google's privacy policy for further information. To opt out of these cookies, please visit Google's website.

Cookie name: Sitecore

Purpose: Stores information, such as language and regional preferences, that our content management system (the system we use to update our website) relies on to function.

Function: This is a session cookie and will be destroyed when you close your browser. This cookie is essential for our website to function.

Cookie name: ASP.net_session

Purpose: Allows the website to save your session state across different pages. For example, if you have completed a survey, the website will remember that you have done so and will not ask you to complete it again when you view another page on the website.

Function: This is a session cookie and will be destroyed when you close your browser. This cookie is essential for our website to function.

Cookie name: website#sc_wede

Purpose: Indicates whether the user's browser supports inline editing of content. This indicates whether our content management system will work for our website administrators in their internet browsers.

Function: This is a session cookie and will be destroyed when you close your browser. This cookie is essential for our website to function.

Cookie name: redirected

Purpose: Remembers when the site forwards you from one page to another, so you can return to the first page. For example, go back to the home page after viewing a special 'splash' page.

Function: This is a session cookie, which your browser will destroy when it shuts down. The website needs this cookie to function.

Cookie name: tccookiesprefs

Purpose: Remembers when you respond to the site cookie policy, so you do not see the cookie preferences notice on every page.

Function: If you choose to remember your preference with a temporary cookie, your browser will remove it when you shut it down, otherwise the cookie will be stored for about a year.

Cookie name: _ga

Purpose: Additional Google Analytics cookie. Google Analytics is software that lets us analyse how visitors use our site. We use this information to improve our website and provide the best experience to visitors.

Function: These cookies collect data in an anonymous form. Please see Google's privacy policy for further information.

Cookie name: SC_ANALYTICS_GLOBAL_COOKIE, SC_ANALYTICS_SESSION_COOKIE

Purpose: Sitecore Analytics is software that lets us analyse how visitors use our site. We use this information to improve our website and provide the best experience to visitors.

Function: These cookies collect data in an anonymous form. When you close your browser, it will delete the 'session' cookie; it will keep the 'global' cookie for about one year.

Facebook cookies

We use Facebook 'Like' buttons to share site feedback. For further information, see Facebook's cookie policy page.

Twitter cookies

We use Twitter 'Tweet' buttons to share site feedback. For further information, see Twitter's privacy statement.

YouTube cookies

We embed videos from our official YouTube channel. YouTube uses cookies to help maintain the integrity of video statistics, prevent fraud and to improve their site experience. If you view a video, YouTube may set cookies on your computer once you click on the video player.

Cookies pop-up

When you close the cookies pop-up box by clicking "OK", a permanent cookie will be set on your machine. This will remember your preference so that the pop-up doesn't display across any pages whenever you visit the website.

Opting out/removing cookies

To opt out of Google Analytics cookies, please visit Google’s website.

You can also control what cookies you accept through your internet browser. For details on how to do this, please visit aboutcookies.org. Please note that by deleting our cookies or disabling future cookies you may not be able to access certain areas or features of our website.

mailing list
donate now
join now
shop

Oliver Letwin, MP exposes the EU Constitution

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

The fourth of the Bruges Group’s papers on the draft EU Constitution dissects the threat it poses to Britain’s legal system. Oliver Letwin exposes one of the least noticed features of the EU constitution. He argues that it provides the basis for the gradual transfer of virtually the entire criminal law from national Parliaments to Brussels. The Criminal Justice provisions will undermine Britain’s laws, legal system and procedure and the unique safeguards that have developed in Common Law. Oliver Letwin also critiques the Government’s slight-of-hand in pretending that the Constitution does not represent a significant change to Britain’s laws and legal traditions.

Oliver Letwin highlights the provisions of concern. Chapter IV Section I, reads: "The Union will take measures to prevent and combat crime, racism and xenophobia". It goes on to tell us that the Union will aim at "the approximation of criminal laws". Chapter IV Section IV tells us that: "judicial co-operation in criminal matters in the Union...shall include the approximation of the laws and regulations of the Member States". He says, "This is, in other words, a document that begins to put the local judiciaries in the position of working towards the approximation of the criminal laws between the States - I don't think that implication has been spelt out by Mr Hain if, indeed, he has remotely noticed it."

Oliver Letwin then analyses the so-called Framework Law, which is to establish measures to: "prevent and settle conflicts of jurisdictions between Member States." And, "to facilitate co-operation in criminal matters between judicial and equivalent authorities in relation to proceedings and the enforcement of decisions." These will, according to Mr Letwin, effect criminal proceedings and the enforcement of decisions, i.e. in policing. A European Framework Law may establish "minimum rules concerning admissibility of evidence, definition of the rights of individuals in criminal procedure, rights to victims and any other specific aspects of criminal procedure which the Council has identified." This turns even court procedure into an EU Competence (power).

The authors of the draft are primarily concerned with definitions of, and sanctions for, serious crimes. Such as: "terrorism, trafficking in human beings and sexual exploitation of women and children, illicit drug trafficking, illicit arms trafficking, money laundering, corruption, counterfeiting of means of payment, computer crime and organised crime." Yet the authors of the draft don't regard that as a limit, because they go on to tell us that the Council can add "to the list". This could extend the EU institutions interference into all criminal areas.

This is, in short, a clear charter for the progressive transfer of control over the criminal law of the UK and other Member States from our Parliament to the Council, the Commission, the ECJ and the European Parliament. Oliver Letwin states that, "If Mr Hain believes that such a transfer is a "tidying up exercise", it is difficult to know what Mr Hain would regard as serious."

As Oliver Letwin argues, "The modern State has, as its primary purpose, to protect one person against others. In our own case, this conception goes right back to Magna Carta and beyond... Our freedom was established when Henry II set about the creation of the common law; when the Barons brought King John to Runnymede... Right back to the foundations of the modern State... " These freedoms will be undermined by the EU Constitution.

Oliver Letwin explains why the criminal justice provisions are in the Constitution, "...the only plausible motive for the people who have drafted this draft - is to lay one of the principal foundations of statehood. The authors have built into the Constitution the basis upon which, progressively, the combined forces of the Council, of the ECJ, of the Parliament, and of the judiciaries of the Member States, will transfer power over the criminal law from the Member States to the central authorities, and thereby help to establish those central authorities as the primary State."

He Concludes, "This is not a tidying-up exercise. To transfer power over the criminal law is, on the contrary, one of the most fundamental things that could happen to this country's constitution. It is bad enough that such a thing should be put forward by a Prime Minister of this country. It is unspeakable that he should suggest it is something about which it is not necessary to vote in a referendum and for which it is not necessary to obtain the full-hearted consent of the British people."